September 28, 2026
%2520(1)%2520(2).jpeg)
Article by Irina Constantin, Founder & CEO, VAUNT
At this point, almost every real estate organization has used some form of AI. The question has shifted from "should we use AI?" to "which AI is actually going to have the most impact on my business?"
I've spent the last few years watching developers and brokerages work through that question, and most of them start in the same place. They get a tool that writes listing descriptions, add a chatbot to the website, maybe roll out ChatGPT to the sales team. All of that is useful. Very little of it changes how many units they sell or lease.
The AI that does move that number has one thing in common. It's working with the team's own pipeline data.
The models behind most real estate AI are the same ones everyone else is using. Your competitor two blocks away has access to exactly what you have. So the edge has to come from somewhere else, and in our experience it comes from the data the AI is working with.
For a sales or leasing team, the most valuable data is what you generate yourselves: every inquiry, where it came from, who toured, which unit they asked about, who followed up and when, and what finally closed. We call that proprietary real estate data, because no listing portal or ad platform ever sees all of it. Zillow sees its piece, Meta sees its piece, and your agents each carry a piece in their inboxes.
When a team tells me their AI tools aren't doing much for them, I usually find the same problem underneath. The data is spread across too many places. Leads come in through portals and ads, inventory lives in a spreadsheet or a broker's email, follow-up happens in personal inboxes, and deals get tracked somewhere else.
Then there are duplicates. Someone asks about a unit on StreetEasy, sees an ad on Instagram a week later, and fills out the form on your website. That's one buyer, but most systems count three leads, which quietly throws off every conversion number you report.
And a lot of important activity never gets recorded at all. A text, a call from someone's cell, a note from a showing. If it isn't logged, the AI can't learn from it.
You can usually work around one of these problems. When all three are happening at once, the AI is mostly guessing.
Two kinds. The first is your own pipeline, captured completely and consistently. The second is context: how your numbers compare to similar buildings, unit types, and price points. A 4% conversion rate sounds fine until you learn comparable projects are closing at twice that. Without the comparison, you can't tell whether you have a problem.
When both live in the same system, each project leaves you better prepared for the next one.
VAUNT customers have run more than $2.7B in residential transactions through the platform, and every one of those records is structured the same way, from first inquiry to signed contract. That lets us look across our own anonymized, aggregated data and see things you won't find in surveys or public records.
When we compared the first half of 2026 with the first half of 2025, three things stood out.
The first was how much harder each sale has become. Among the same accounts, calls to prospects went up 52% and direct client interactions went up 32%, even as closed deals went down. Put together, teams are making roughly 2.5 times as many calls for every contract they sign. The buyers are still out there. They just take more work to convert.
The second was about price. The median sale price rose 26%, which on its own would suggest a hot market. But when we looked at the same projects across both periods, price per square foot rose only about 3.6%. Most of that 26% came from buyers choosing larger units in more premium buildings. A team going off the headline number might have raised prices. A team looking at the detail would have adjusted its unit mix instead.
The third follows from the second. Deals in the upper price tiers nearly doubled as a share of sales, and three-bedroom units made up a much bigger portion of what sold. The buyers who stayed active were buying bigger.
We only rely on findings that still hold when any single customer or project is taken out of the data, so none of this comes from one large account skewing the picture.
With only its own spreadsheets, a team would have seen fewer deals and not much else. With structured data and market context, it could have seen where the extra effort was going, which buyers were serious, and what to change about pricing and inventory while there was still time to act.
Once the data is in good shape, AI starts helping in ways that show up in revenue. Inside VAUNT, that looks like a few things.
Performance Score compares each team against anonymized benchmarks from across the platform, so you know whether your numbers are good, not just what they are. AI Client Insights scores every contact on how likely they are to buy, based on what they've actually done, which matters a lot when every deal takes 2.5 times the calls. AI Listings Ingestion reads broker emails, PDFs, and floor plans and pulls out unit-level inventory automatically. It's already running with our US customers.
The VAUNT AI Assistant lets your team ask questions about the pipeline in plain English, something like "who toured a three-bedroom last week and hasn't heard back from us?", and get an answer, a report, or an Excel export. Customers using automations built on the same data have seen response rates go up by as much as 35%. Agentic AI goes a step further and handles the work itself: it books meetings in the calendar, sets up automations, and sends emails and text campaigns.
Want to see what this looks like in practice? We break down the technology behind VAUNT AI, with side-by-side examples against general-purpose AI, on our VAUNT AI page.
It's a fair question to ask any vendor. VAUNT has completed Google's CASA security assessment. We never share a customer's data, and anything we learn across the platform comes from aggregated, anonymized patterns.
Before adding another tool, these are the questions I'd ask:
The teams that get the most out of AI over the next few years probably won't be the ones with the most tools. It'll be the ones whose data is clean and connected enough for the AI to actually use.
That's what we built VAUNT for. It runs the pipeline before the lease or the contract, and the AI on top of it understands all of it.
If you're launching sales or leasing on a new building in the next 6 to 12 months, book a 20-minute call about your building and we'll show you what VAUNT can do with a real question from your pipeline.
The best AI for real estate is the one working with your complete pipeline data. Generic AI tools use the same models everyone has. AI built on your own inquiries, tours, follow-ups, and transactions, plus market benchmarks, can show you where you're losing revenue and what to do next.
Usually because the data is scattered across tools, duplicated across lead sources, or incomplete. AI can't produce reliable answers from fragmented data, no matter how good the model is.
AI scores leads by buy likelihood, extracts unit inventory from broker emails, answers pipeline questions in plain English, benchmarks performance against similar buildings, and automates follow-up so prospects don't go cold.
It's the operating data a sales or leasing team generates through its own pipeline: inquiries, sources, tours, follow-ups, and transactions. No listing portal or ad platform sees all of it, which is what makes it a competitive advantage.
No. AI takes over the repetitive work, like logging activity, sorting leads, drafting follow-ups, and pulling reports, so agents spend more of their time on tours, negotiations, and relationships. The teams that benefit most use AI to make their people faster, not to replace them.
Marketing AI creates content: listing descriptions, ad copy, social posts. Pipeline AI works with your sales and leasing data to tell you which leads are serious, where deals are stalling, and which sources actually produce contracts. Marketing AI saves time. Pipeline AI changes results.
It depends on the state of your data. Teams that already track leads, tours, and deals in one system can see useful answers within weeks. Teams working across spreadsheets and inboxes usually need to consolidate their data first, and that step is where most of the value comes from.
Yes, especially during a lease-up or sales launch, when every week of slow follow-up has a real cost. A new building also has no legacy data to clean up, which makes it one of the easiest places to start with a structured pipeline from day one.
It depends on the platform. Look for independent security assessments like Google CASA, and confirm your data is never shared and is only used in anonymized, aggregated form for benchmarks.
Irina Constantin is the Founder & CEO of VAUNT and a Forbes 30 Under 30 honoree. VAUNT is a Deloitte Technology Fast 500 EMEA winner and an NYU Tandon Future Labs company.